Since the advent of KeyStyle for PR timecards, we have to have two pay periods open at one time: one that is being processed (last week's time) and one for entry of the current week's time. Because the 'Post Auto Earnings' and 'Salary Distribution' functions are batch processes, they will auto-pick the oldest open batch. This results in - if we are not careful - posting Auto Earnings for the previous week into the current week's KeyStyle batch, and posting that batch. We can re-open a new one, but employees cannot see posted time in their current timecard. This is problematic at best.
How about adding a flag to batches created within KeyStyle, that don't allow them to be posted by either the PR Auto Earnings or Salary Distribution processes?
Company | MTech Mechanical |
Job Title / Role | Payroll/GL Accountant |
I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
I am moving this suggestion over to the Vista team.