Submit Your Suggestions for Vista

Ideaspace topics with the most votes have been moved into the Suggestion Box. If there is a topic missing, please re-enter. Our product team reviews the Suggestion Box items regularly and will provide updates as to status and incorporation into upcoming releases.

• Home /
• PF-I-737 /
• New Suggestion

159 Vote

Have the ability to implement a hard error when subcontracts/PO's are being cut against phase codes that don't have the funds in it to support that PO or Subcontract.

Right now, PO's and Subcontracts can be cut to phase codes that do not have the budget available. This would require change orders first to move funds, guaranteeing the available budget. As it is now, the budget has the ability to go negative and can result in not obtaining signed change orders. 

• Guest
• May 17 2018
• In Development

Company	DBSI
Job Title / Role	Procurement
I need it...	Yesterday...Come on already

• Comments (5)
• Votes (159)

• Attach files

  Enter a subject
• 
  Laura Strand commented

  February 16, 2021 22:10

  I would hope this error doesn't stop input, only warns that budget has been exceeded. There are times when we allow the item to go over funds available, I wouldn't want to have to process a change order in every instance.

  ×

  Attachments Open full size
• 
  Guest commented

  May 07, 2019 00:33

  We purposely write purchase orders in excess of the budget. We can easily see where estimating went wrong.  We would want this as an option only so we can continue to commit costs greater than our budget.

  ×

  Attachments Open full size
• 
  Megan Kukal Sabourin commented

  January 18, 2019 16:15

  A warning would be nice but a hard stop error would hinder process.  The budget could have been short on estimating and if a lump sum contract it would not go back to the owner for added cost as we own the scope shown.

  ×

  Attachments Open full size
• 
  Courtney Walsworth commented

  May 17, 2018 15:06

  Yes please.

  ×

  Attachments Open full size
• 
  Suzanne Baldenegro commented

  May 17, 2018 14:51

  Great suggestion - This would be amazing! 

  ×

  Attachments Open full size

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• +59

Log in / Sign up

Identify yourself with your email address

Email address

Subscribe

You won't be notified about changes to this idea.

Related Suggestion

Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;

We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs. Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.

© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.