Multiple attachments appear on the job cost that may not apply to the transaction if multiple transaction codings are associated with a single header. This is particularly true when importing Comdata transactions into Viewpoint because each header is associated with one cardholder who might have multiple transactions tied to their card.
Guest
| Company | Stahl Construction Company |
| Job Title / Role | Controller |
| I need it... | 6 months |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
We have an open case on this: #1328582. Below is case narrative. Ditto to what appears above plus. Causes major headache when pulling T&M backup.
JC Cost Detail Drilldown is showing multiple images. We use Comdata's CEMS app to capture credit card receipts at the transaction level. The transactions are coded within Comdata's expense management portal and imported into Vista. Each cardholder's statement consisting of multiple transactions is imported to Vista as a single invoice. While the images for that statement are attached within the Comdata app at the transaction/line item detail level, all images for that statement are appearing on AP Vendor Drilldown and JC Cost Detail Drilldown. (This is further exacerbated by the duplicate images on drilldown reports, which have not been corrected. Issue #64510.) There is a unique JC transaction ID for each line item passed to JC by AP Entry. Can that be used to isolate the correct image for the JC detail transaction? Another option might be to import each credit card transaction as a separate invoice? Bottom line, we need the corresponding image for each JC detail transaction. The attached documentation shows an example of a cardholder statement with 4 transactions, showing 8 images on AP Vendor Drilldown and 12 images on JC Cost Detail Drilldown.