This would be a nice feature to have for when I have a layoff I can process one or multiple employees on a pay sequence. Right now if I have multiple employees on a pay sequence and have a layoff I have to delete the employees time on one pay sequence, and then add it to a different pay sequence.
Company | Superior Construciton |
Job Title / Role | Assistant Controller |
I need it... | Yesterday...Come on already |
Dear Viewpoint Suggestion Box contributor;
We at Viewpoint sincerely thank you for your contribution to Suggestion Box on how we can improve Viewpoint products. While we can’t do everything at once, we rely upon your feedback to help guide the prioritization of our product improvements, and Suggestion Box is a critical tool for us to understand and prioritize our customers’ needs.
Viewpoint reviews Suggestion Box regularly for all of our products and updates statuses, adds comments, and performs various house-keeping (including deleting) as needed to ensure that Suggestion Box is maintained as a productive environment for product enhancements requests.
© 2023 Trimble Inc. All Rights Reserved. Viewpoint®, Vista™, Spectrum®, ProContractor™, Jobpac Connect™, Viewpoint Team™, Viewpoint Analytics™, Viewpoint Field View™, Viewpoint Estimating™, Viewpoint For Projects™, Viewpoint HR Management™, Viewpoint Field Management™, Viewpoint Financial Controls™, Vista Field Service™, Spectrum Service Tech™, ViewpointOne™, ProjectSight® and Trimble Construction One™ are trademarks or registered trademarks of Trimble Inc. or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
It would also be useful to clear one EFT without having to clear the whole batch.
Yes, we should be able to create a "batch" of employees. Security would assign rights to give someone the ability to create a "batch" of employees, then delete them after the timesheet, process, etc is done and the layoff checks posted.
Gary,
This would help out greatly while we process EFT payments.Having a filter that would sort by an employee number would be the most beneficial to our company.
Overall being able to process the same pay sequence in EFT payments multiple times, similar to how PR Check Print is handled, will greatly reduce time spent each week keying/uploading payroll time.
Thanks,
Rory
My proposal was to add one or more filters to the EFT process, similar to Check printing allowing you to restrict who would be included.
Possible filters might include Employee#, Check Print Order, or others suggested by users. If fitlering was added, would it address the problem? And if yes, what filters would be most helpful?
This will not help out my situation though if I need to do an EFT and not a check….
Thanks,
Rory Carlson | Assistant Controller
Superior Construction Co., Inc.
1455 Louis Sullivan Dr. | Portage, IN 46368
O. 219.787.0850 | F. 219.763.9998 | M. 219.781.1613
rcarlson@superiorconstruction.com | www.superiorconstruction.com
[cid:image002.jpg@01CF11CC.5B2FE5E0]
This can be done when paying employees by check by assigning a Check Print Order value in PR Employee Seq Control and using the selection criteria offered in PR Check Print. This feature was added to handle mid-week lay off situations when checks need to be printed and delivered to the field ahead of normal pay period payment processing and avoid having to move existing time entries to another Pay Seq.
Appears that adding similar selection and filtering criteria to EFT Payment processing would meet the need. Comments?